NEW DELHI: Supreme Court has said that criminal law cannot become a platform for initiation of vindictive proceedings to settle personal scores and vendettas, and derided the increasing resort to lodging of FIRs to settle civil disputes.
While quashing an FIR lodged more than two decades ago for the offence of cheating in a land transaction case, a bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and R Mahadevan said, "In recent years, the machinery of criminal justice is being misused by certain persons for their vested interests and for achieving their oblique motives and agenda."
While Jharkhand high court took 15 years to dismiss the plea for quashing of the FIR, SC took another six years to reverse the HC verdict.
Writing the judgment, Justice Nagarathna said given the misuse of criminal law , "courts have to be vigilant against such tendencies". tnn
SC: Duty of HC to step in, stop abuse of law
Chiding the complainant for his inability to prove charges against the appellant, court said such actions "create significant divisions & distrust among people while also placing an unnecessary strain on the judicial system, particularly criminal courts".
Justice Nagarathna said courts must ensure that such "acts of omission and commission having an adverse impact on the fabric of our society must be nipped in the bud".
The bench said every act of breach of trust may not result in a penal offence unless there is evidence of a manipulating act of fraudulent misappropriation of property. "It is duty of HC to intervene where continuation of criminal proceedings would amount to an abuse of process of law, or where the dispute is purely of a civil nature and criminal colour has been artificially given to it," it said.
While quashing an FIR lodged more than two decades ago for the offence of cheating in a land transaction case, a bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and R Mahadevan said, "In recent years, the machinery of criminal justice is being misused by certain persons for their vested interests and for achieving their oblique motives and agenda."
While Jharkhand high court took 15 years to dismiss the plea for quashing of the FIR, SC took another six years to reverse the HC verdict.
Writing the judgment, Justice Nagarathna said given the misuse of criminal law , "courts have to be vigilant against such tendencies". tnn
SC: Duty of HC to step in, stop abuse of law
Chiding the complainant for his inability to prove charges against the appellant, court said such actions "create significant divisions & distrust among people while also placing an unnecessary strain on the judicial system, particularly criminal courts".
Justice Nagarathna said courts must ensure that such "acts of omission and commission having an adverse impact on the fabric of our society must be nipped in the bud".
The bench said every act of breach of trust may not result in a penal offence unless there is evidence of a manipulating act of fraudulent misappropriation of property. "It is duty of HC to intervene where continuation of criminal proceedings would amount to an abuse of process of law, or where the dispute is purely of a civil nature and criminal colour has been artificially given to it," it said.
You may also like
'Do you think I'll flee?' Ex-Nepal Oli rejects escape rumours; dares Karki to give proof of role in protest
'Esprit de corps': Donald Trump likely to attend rare gathering of military officials in Virginia; calls generals as 'cherished leaders'
'If Operation Sindoor was ongoing ... ': Congress slams PM Modi's post after India's Asia Cup win; row over playing match
Sohail Khan shares a "rare photo" of parents Salim Khan, Salma Khan, Helen relaxing together
Keir Starmer issued tax warning ahead of key Budget
